Friday, 18 November 2011
-
Hit Or Miss: Pippa Middleton Has Leggingbutt
The love-it-or-loathe-it trend tends to arrive at the compromise, "if you've got it, flaunt it, as long as your undies aren't showing," but is it OK for a relative royal to be rocking the leggingbutt?
To be fair, here it is from behind.
She wears it well, but should she be wearing it at all?
RecommendRelated Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to lovelyish's Lovelyish Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in lovelyish's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
Comments (48)
Girl's got one of the nicest ass out there. Hell, she almost out-shined her sis for that ass.
MORE POWER TO YA!
she looks fine...
... I can't find it.
looks fine. she can wear whatever she wants
I've been wondering that about people in my class.
this woman has such a beautiful figure she can't go wrong. and I think her butt looks just as good as pippas! :)
she definitely has the body to rock it but i still don't think it looks right. it just looks funny when there's no actual pants or something covered the leggings. i guess i just see leggings sort of like tights, which is why i can't see them as valid pants options. just my perception.
Leggings are not pants. If they were, they would be called legging pants. But they're not. It's not a flattering look on hardly anyone.
@LeaK - well that's good because it is Pippa
What does her being an "almost Royal" have to do with whether it looks appropriate or not?
@LeaK - ...it is Pippa.
The fact that you continue to write about Pippa Middleton is a MISS.
you need one of those amber rose stripper bodies to wear leggings. she doesn't have it.
I'm sure she should be able to wear whatever she wants regardless of who her sister married.
@FuntimeswithGoldie@xanga - Leggings sure were pants in the 80s!
There seems to be two types of leggings now. Ones that are spandexy type material and ones that are more like tights. These pants on Pippa look like the spandex type. We wore them as pants in the 80s all the time.
I seriously don't get the hype about her ass.. It's as flat as a pancake!
I honestly don't see what's so special about her butt... it's pretty flat and I've seen other girls with better butts than hers. Leggings as pants = miss, but I like her coat.
She has a good butt because it's actually toned and shapely. Big butt does not equal attractive butt.
@TiredSoVeryTired@xanga - I agree.
There is a difference between Leggings and footless tights. Leggings are pants and footless tights are tights. It is easy to tell the difference. I think leggings look better than jogging pants on any day of the ear.
In my opinion, even if she were "a royal" she should be able to wear whatever she wants.
The fact that she's a royal shouldn't have anything to do with it...let the girl wear what she wants! However, I don't think she has a world-renowned ass...in fact I barely see an ass at all. Which looks fine, but I don't get the big deal about it.
As I've said before, she has no ass.
@GreenTeaReverie@xanga - And a small butt doesn't equal toned. Usually just unlucky genes or being to skinny.
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - But I didn't say she had a small butt. I said she had a toned one. So, we disagree. On something this silly. haha!
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - Also..there are a lot of guys who don't like big butts. :/ Toned or not. So, it's more about taste than "unfortunate genes". I myself am amply endowed, so I'm not biased. I'm just observant.
nice butt or not, wearing leggings with your butt uncovered is trashy and tacky