Yes, the show’s an iconic television show. It also (arguably) helped pave the way for women actually talking about their sex lives on television. But here’s why I think this show may not be the best shows for learning how to have a good love life.
Trust me, I love watching Sex and the City. I think the writing is absolutely brilliant, and has deserved every one of its seven Emmy awards. But I think it sends a lot of bad and unrealistic messages about love. I know they’re supposedly some of the coolest women on television ever, but they’re definitely not perfect in terms of love lives. Maybe it’s time to stop seeing this show as the ultimate authority on how relationships “should” be.
Just to prove my point, here’s what I feel the main women of SATC are really like. They’re not perfect role models, and we should be careful not to repeat their mistakes. Be warned, there are spoilers ahead!
I identify so much with Miranda, just because she deals with a lot of work-life balance that isn’t really addressed with the other characters. She was the first to become a mother, the first to get her own apartment, and has some of the best quips of the entire show. In a show about relationships, she was the one who was the most cynical about the whole system of dating. It was great!
But one issue kept coming up this strong lady: She was always hesitant to try anything new in her love life. Most of the men she dated throughout the series were high-powered career types just like her. And even within that set, there was some inflexibility: She couldn’t date a guy that was too sweet, a guy with sexual kinks, and even a guy who simply wanted to try new things in bed. It was always about finding someone who fit her idea of what was right, who could be on her schedule.
Needless to say, this isn’t the best attitude to have with love (and life). Not trying anything new can narrow your own experiences, and can limit your own growth as a potential romantic partner. Sure enough, once Miranda opened up to people outside her “type,” her character became a lot more well-rounded. Not to mention happier! Her final boyfriend in the city, Steve Brady (a bartender), was so different than Miranda (a lawyer) that it causes friction in their relationship for a long time. But eventually…
Charlotte’s definitely one of the most likable people on SATC, and why not? She’s friendly, acts classy, and is definitely one of the most love-optimistic characters on the show. She openly cares about her friends, throwing them baby showers and always trying her best to be a good friend. Frickin’ adorable!
But Charlotte’s trademark was her optimism about eventually finding the man of her dreams. In fact, one of her biggest flaws was her desire to have a man who was absolutely perfect. She’s definitely the kind of girl who would have made a list of everything she ever wanted in a man, then looked for partners with those qualities once she was old enough to date. But once she thought she found the perfect man, well…
I was glad to see Trey and Charlotte broke up. It gave Charlotte a chance to explore new possibilities — like Harry! He was everything Charlotte did not anticipate wanting in a man, and at first it was very hard for her to accept. But when they broke up after she was mean to him about his imperfections, things finally clicked. Charlotte learned that not everything could go her way all the time, and that you have to work with who people already are. But this was only after a long struggle. She tried to mold Trey into The Perfect Husband, and ending up ignoring big issues that later led to their breakup. When the same thing happened with Harry, she finally got it.
The character of Samantha is probably the driver of most of the comedy in SATC. She was one of the brashest characters on the show, the least afraid to talk about sex and definitely the least afraid to experiment sexually. She was the “free spirit,” the one who compelled the other women to go outside their comfort zones. Not to mention be totally honest about how they felt about their partners…
But have you noticed that through it all, Samantha barely sees anyone she actually likes? Like Charlotte, she is a contortion of what real women are really like. But instead of being incredibly idealistic about love, Samantha is (for the most part) reluctant to share any part of her heart with her sex partners. Most women aren’t like this — they fall somewhere in the middle between the two extremes. No doubt there are real women out there who see sex and relationships how Samantha does. I tip my hat to them and wish them all the happiness and fulfillment, because I sure as heck am not like that. My issue with Samantha is that the show usually doesn’t reveal the downside of being closed off emotionally to partners over and over. It’s not something everyone can do!
Finally, Miss Carrie Bradshaw. The icon, the main event. The one with the delightful speaking voice narrating every show…
But there’s a big glaring fact about Carrie that a lot of people seem to forget: She picks men that treat her badly, and pushes away guys that treat her well. It’s something everyone does at some point, unless you’re one of those rare people who who found the right person right away. Carrie does this over and over, the main example being Mr. Big.
If you know anything about SATC, you’ve probably heard about Mr. Big. Handsome, suave, rich… and totally emotionally unavailable. He would draw Carrie in, win her heart, and then push her away if it got too close for comfort. He was like a drug to Carrie, who actually broke off a relationship with a kind and emotionally supportive man to be with Big. And that didn’t even last! Big just never fully let Carrie in, not even with the big details of his life. Never a good sign!
I could go on and on about how this relationship was screwed up from the beginning, but I really don’t want to. Carrie’s relationship with Big was one of the main plots of the television show and movies, and there’s no denying it made for good entertainment. I think a lot of women identified with her reactions to Big’s undeniably jerky behavior, and that’s partially what made her so endearing to the audience. But it was not a good relationship, and it certainly caused Carrie a lot of pain. Perhaps the worst part was that she chose Big all those times they broke up and got back together, never truly learning from her mistakes. Not the best role model for people learning about love, I think.
SATC will always be a good show in my eyes. It was well written, well costumed, and the actors cast were very talented. It changed the way a lot of people viewed sex, relationships, and modern women in general. But I hope viewers, especially younger women seeing it for the first time, take Carrie’s and every other character’s relationships on the show with a grain of salt. I think the characters in this show are more like case studies than actual examples of what love is really like. While that makes for great entertainment, it also means we need to be smart consumers. We can still learn about love from SATC — thought it’s more along the lines of what not to do.
Do you like “Sex and the City”? What, if anything, have you learned about love through watching it?
Don’t forget to follow Lovelyish on Pinterest, Twitter, Facebook & Tumblr!
Image source, Image source, Image source, Image source, Image source
orchid / 115 posts
ok, lets be honest, who ACTUALLY thought Sex and the City was a good tool for learning about love? I mean, really… really?
guest
Eh I don’t think SATC was meant to show us how relationships are supposed to be. I’m a huge fan of the shows, not the movies, but I don’t think that is the message the writers were trying to get to us. I saw it as four women with issues trying to fall in love lol. I mean they all had issues and if you’ve watched the show you know they have A LOT.
guest
People who think TV shows are supposed to teach them things about life when they are over the age of 12 are the ones that fail.
I am pretty sure I didn’t have a single thought when I used to watch SATC…except maybe those shoes are cute.
daisy / 597 posts
Maybe it’s time to stop seeing this show as the ultimate authority on how relationships “should” be.
—–…
Good grief. This is why I stopped reading.
guest
my issue with the post title: when was sex in the city about love? maybe i haven’t seen the episodes in a while but its about sex adventures is how i took it. they’re way too uncompromising and unrealistic to land an actual lasting, fulfilling relationship. i think they would have to expand and be more open to make something last. but i haven’t seen the shows in a while, so.
guest
I DISAGREE!
You just wrote a very insightful post that summarized each character’s flaw when it comes to love which in itself is a lesson for women.
guest
Uh, who looks at TV programmes for advice on how to live life?!
guest
How about: because that show wasn’t realistic AT ALL about men or women, what they want, why they want it, and how they act?
guest
Yea, sorry, I have to agree with the other commenters. NO ONE looked at SATC as life/love lessons. The reason I personally LOVE SATC so much is because it is SO REAL. Yes, it’s exaggerated, but the deeper stuff is very real. They have flaws like real women have flaws. They have relationships that have real issues and problems, because in “real life” there is no such thing as a perfect relationship and this shows it. You CAN look at it as a love lesson, by learning from the mistakes these girls make, but in love, there really is no ability to learn. You just “do” and “react” and take it one day at a time. No two people or relationships are the same. You can’t really learn from anyone except yourself.
sunflower / 255 posts
This show was successful because the characters were flawed and so were their relationships. If this show was a perfect example of love, it wouldn’t have been Sex and the City. (And I would have never ended up watching all of the seasons.)
guest
I’d have to disagree. To me, all the arguments you used only pointed out how genuine and flawed the characters actually are. I don’t know about you, but I’ve met women like each of the four SATC friends, so I think both the various plots/arcs of the show and the characters do represent/parallel real-life premises that consider sex, love, friendship, and a whole bunch of other stuff.
That said, like you, I do think there’s something to be learned from TV shows, regardless of how derisive others might be about a statement like this. Of course there’s tons of fluff out there, but instead of automatically finding something lacking because it’s not “real” doesn’t mean it should be totally disregarded. Fiction, whether in art, books, oral stories, film, or stage, is based in some part off of reality, and sometimes it has a better grasp of what’s important than “actual people” do. Comedy, drama, horror, suspense, and other genres of fiction – I can personally say I’ve been affected by thought-provoking ideas found in all of the mediums I mentioned two sentences ago. I’m an observer and absorber of things that happen to me as well as others, so that’s my take on the whole situation.
Anyway, even though I didn’t agree with your overarching theme, I thought your analysis was still interesting. Thanks for sharing!
guest
It’s looking like I agree with the others, really. I think I managed to watch a few episodes but could not stand any more of it. Not surprising as I’m not a target demographic.
guest
They’re characters. Sure, well written characters are dynamic and grow, but they really only have to grow within the episode’s time slot. They keep them in a certain constraint or else they would lose their lovable little character traits.
guest
Okay, this show is NOT about what your love life should be like. It’s a comedy about the hardships about finding a decent mate in today’s busy and modern world and it’s pretty much a bunch of women sharing the BLOOPERS in their love lives. If you didn’t already know that you shouldn’t follow this show for tips on how to have a good love life.. well, duh. It’s just supposed to be funny and something to relate to so you don’t feel so bad if you’ve fucked up a million times in your love life too.
guest
I hate Sex in the City. My room mate used to watch it regularly and I wanted to toss the TV out the window…..
That being said, I think that the fact that the characters have such glaring flaws makes the show more believable and ultimately more watchable. I think it’s good to have that level of credibility to a person’s emotions.
And I guess, like what most other posts here before have stated, ‘I don’t think Sex in the City is about ‘Love’ in the City, — it’s about dating and getting all the things that come with risking life with someone other than yourself.
guest
Never got into this show. Thank you for summarizing it for me Lol. I can actually tell you put a lot of thought into this and your points about the characters were interesting. Unfortunately, your main point is kind of…ridiculous. No one thought Sex and the City was relationship counseling in the first place.
guest
I’m going to pull out the immature card and say that I think this is one of the stupidest posts I’ve ever read concerning Sex and the City..sorry.
guest
It’s called SEX and the City. WTF do you think it’s going to teach you about? Sex is not equivalent to love, and those with half a brain cell know that. Also, it’s just a TV show. Why would anyone be trying to learn about love or anything of any importance from a TV show unless it’s a documentary?… Once again, anyone with half a brain cell knows that. And the fact that someone spent so much time writing this post makes me sad… Is the next post on Lovelyish going to be about why you can’t be healthy if you eat McDonald’s 24/7? Or how about the pressing topic of if huffing paint is bad or not?
guest
This was a very well written analysis! I agree with most of what you said. Except that part about the show not revealing the downfall of Samantha’s closed off heart. Lest we not forget the episode when Samantha had just moved into her fancy new apartment in the meatpacking district, and she got sick. She called a few fck-buddies to come to her rescue with chicken soup, but either they didn’t have the time, or only wanted to come over to get laid. Samantha (when speaking to Carrie, who does come to her rescue): “I’m gonna tell you something. There are two types of guys out there – the ones that hold your hand, and the ones that fuck you….And the guys that fuck you aren’t worth a damn. (crying) We’re all alone, Carrie.”
guest
Gosh ppl are mean. Everyone’s comment’s on this post has been so negative. Geesh! There are actually some people, ill-informed as they may be, who would be impressioned by a t.v. show, and you were just pointing out reasons why to take this show with a grain of salt. Good job WriterBrit!