The Hunger Games, the young-adult dystopian sensation that already broke records with its first theatrical installment, has now set the release dates for its final film adaptation to complete the series. Yes, that’s right – dates. Mockingjay, Suzanne Collins’ finale of the Hunger Games trilogy, will be divided into two separate films, following suit of many successful adapted series such as Twilight and Harry Potter. Therefore, the final final film will be in the very distant future.
And the schedule release dates are reminiscent of another YA sensation that’s coming to a close. How do the Twilight and The Hunger Games series compare?
Catching Fire, the second book of The Hunger Games, has already been scheduled to open on November 22, 2013. As for the third book, Mockingjay, Part 1 is scheduled for November 21, 2014, and Part 2 is scheduled for November 20, 2015. So sit tight, because it will be over three years until your Katniss-Peeta-Gale obsession is ultimately sated.
This November opening weekend is the same weekend in which the Twilight franchise has marked its territory for four years now. With their billion-dollar ride shutting down this year, it looks as if film execs are proclaiming this weekend reserved for outrageously popular young-adult film adaptations as the Hunger Games installments are picking up where Twilight left off.
The similarities between both series have been debated since The Hunger Games’ rise in popularity, but how do they really compare? Both worlds contain heroines, love triangles, life-threatening predicaments and the ladies experiencing personal struggles that define their true self at a very taxing time in life. But from what I can gather (I have not read Hunger Games, but I have read the majority of Twilight) the similarities end there.
Do you feel like these two leading ladies — Katniss and Bella — have much in common? Truth be told, I couldn’t finish the Twilight saga because I found Bella insufferable. Her fragility in her deadly relationship was one thing, but her hopeless sense of self-worth and self-deprecation rendered her character annoying as well. I understand that she’s an awkward teenager, but I was grasping for development and still could not find an aspect of her character to empathize with. Again, I realize her character is that of a regular, angsty adolescent, but in a series that has captivated many impressionable young girls, it’s a concept that can leave you feeling unempowered.
I have not read The Hunger Games, so my interpretation is based on the first film. Katniss, converse to Bella, controls her fate, in the near fatal situation that she has been dealt. And she is able to conquer and manipulate the unforgiving world she is thrown into very well. There are glints of romance, but her drive to survive is unimpeded by them and she manages to implement the amorous concept in her favor.
How do you feel about both series and how do they compare?
[via Entertainment Weekly]
[Image Source 1, 2]
ranunculus / 3457 posts
2015? Dude, I love Jennifer Lawrence, but she already looks too old to be Katniss.. in three years… just no…
guest
I have not read the Twilight books, but enjoyed the movies as a guilty pleasure. (I will have to admit that I found it a bit unreasonable for Bella to have been so depressed after Edward left. I mean, c’mon, she was young, not like she’ll never meet another guy!) I have read the first Hunger Games book and have seen the movie, enjoyed that as well. Apparently, I do not have very high expectations for movies anymore–I only really consider them for entertainment more than anything. (I’m happy as long as I find the movie entertaining.) However, I would not say that I could compare the two–the concept is completely different. While The Hunger Games movie (and books) was relatively popular, I will say the money’s on Breaking Dawn Part 2.
guest
Bella and Katniss don’t compare at all. The premise of each storyline is very different. I’m thinking THG will kick some sparkly ass.
guest
Twilight is almost as good as Jersey Shore Shark Attack, but not as good as Sharktopus. I haven’t seen the Hunger Games, I think I could probably watch it without being reduced to tears from hysterical laughter. I actually wanted to see Hunger Games, but never got the chance.
guest
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - that’s just when the movie is going to be released. i’m sure they’ll start filming before then.
guest
I didn’t realize Twilight still had a fanbase.
guest
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - That’s when it will be released. It’ll be filmed probably by 2014. Two years… ehh. Maybe with makeup she’ll still look semi-young? We’ll see!
guest
I always find it weird that Hunger Games and Twilight get compared so frequently. I realize they’re both books with young fan bases, but apart from that, the subject matter is so different that it’s hard to even say anything significant about how they compare other than “Bella is very needy whereas Katniss is very independent, I like Hunger Games because it’s refreshingly smart, I like Twilight because the cardboard cutouts passing off as actors are very symmetrical” etc.
But, anyway, Hunger Games would beat Twilight in a fist fight. It would beat Twilight at Dance Dance Revolution and Mario Kart. If The Hunger Games and Twilight were professional boxers boxing each other, the judges would say that Twilight won, but everyone would know Hunger Games really won. The Hunger Games is The Notorious B.I.G., Harry Potter is 2Pac, and Twilight is Taylor Momsen. If The Hunger Games and Twilight were trying to get elected, Twilight would say, “That’s not fair, The Hunger Games is black.” and find itself an obscure, photogenic female running mate. Twilight is datingish and The Hunger Games is ireallylikefood. Twilight is Hunger Games, but Hunger Games is not Twilight. Hunger Games is Harry Potter. Harry Potter is Star Wars.
guest
I’ve never ever gotten past the first book of Twilight. I tolerated it for a long while because my godmother wanted me to read it, but otherwise, I could not stand Twilight at all. In my opinion, Bella is too whiny and depressing, and dependent on love. Katniss, however, has learned since childhood that she has to be the provider for her family, and she is extremely independent. Okay, yes (spoiler alert, people) she does rely on Peeta to cure her constant spell of nightmares, but Katniss is so much different than Bella.
I’d love to see Bella survive the Hunger Games, as well as all the things Katniss goes through in books 2 and 3… I don’t even think she’d survive the first chapter.
guest
Katniss is everything Bella is not, but after reading the Hunger Game series, I don’t see how they’re going to do the last movie and stay true to the book. The ending was so anticlimactic.
orchid / 106 posts
@Iobot@xanga - I wanted this comment to go on forever.
guest
i don’t think you should be trying to compare the two if you haven’t at least read part of both series.
movies never really get the feeling that books do, the first person pov that shows their feelings, thoughts, and reasons for acting the way they do. and i don’t see much in common besides the ‘love triangle’, if you can even call it that in the hunger games. there’s not much love to be found, especially when katniss is worried about the games.
magnolia / 1066 posts
1. “So sit tight, because it will be over three years until your Katniss-Peeta-Gale obsession is ultimately sated.”
2. Katniss is independent. Bella is not. Bella constantly hurts herself and puts herself in danger. Katniss can take care of herself. Katniss is not dependent on a man. Bella is. Katniss’s love for Gale and Peeta are a totally different dynamic than Bella’s love for Jacob and Edward. Edward treats Bella like property. Neither Peeta nor Gale do that to Katniss.
As someone who has read both series, I feel pretty good in saying there are very minimal similarities between the two.