Lovelyish

MISS. she should go braless. woot

Whose Austin Butler?

I love the whole look. I need that necklace.

it’s classless but that necklace just makes me feel ill

I dislike it with this shirt, but sheer shirts with visible bras look fine when done right. I do it with my (thick) lace shirt and also with another shirt that has a lace front. I would not do it with a shirt that lacks pattern since pattern helps to offer more coverage, or at least the illusion of coverage. And I never wear it lower rising bottoms, always high waists. If I’m wearing a lower waist then I’ll likely wear a vest or jacket on top if I want to skip the camisole. If it’s not sheer enough so that the skin looks obvious under the fabric then I don’t mind wearing it without a cami under

I think it would work better if it were white/light. I know that against my fair skin light sheers don’t look as sheer when paired with a white bra. 

i actually do this all the time, and people in new york do it often too.

She’s thin enough, why not?

@eatdrinkandbemaryy@xanga - It’s common in Houston also.

The looks are ok to me, except I didn’t like the look in the main picture.  Of course, this look would not be suitable on me…no one wants to see my rolls.  She’s youthful and trim, she could show it off if she wants to.

She just likes see through clothes, nothin wrong with that.

she looks ok to me.

Miss. It looks classless to me. Like something a hooker would wear.

nevermind the shirt, that necklace is hideous. 

neither, I don’t think it looks terrifyingly sluttish in that combination, but I don’t see it becoming a trend either.

So… she’s a trashy dresser and she’s wearing a dog collar. Interesting.

I’m fine with the top. As other commenters have said, it’s very common in New York. That necklace, on the other hand… not okay.