Miley Cyrus has gotten quite the reputation as a the braless bandit. She even addressed all the talk and criticism on her Twitter page back in April, stating, “I am who I am. #braless.” To go bra-less you need one of two things: a great rack or a ton of confidence.
If you’ve got the great rack then you don’t need a push up bra to boost your confidence or your cleavage, but some women just want to let their sisters move and bounce about underneath a flowy white tank.
I hear busty women say all the time, “Oh you’re so lucky you have small boobs you never have to wear a bra.” As a medium- to large-chested individual, I can tell you that we’re both unlucky and lucky in different ways. For small-chested women who want to go bra-less, you can manage to pull of this earthy willowy look without looking like a cheap floozy, that doesn’t mean small bra-less boobs look fantastic without a little help from Victoria’s Secret. And as for bustier girls, we walk around and look like insecure bimbos. In other cases, bigger breasts can look sloppy without a bra. So the question remains, who can pull this look off?
UnderwomanWORLD NoShows Nipple Covers, from Amazon
Well, I believe the answer is inconclusive. It’s a case by case issue and it also depends on the top. I would say that larger-chested women who want to burn the bra, figuratively speaking, should opt for a halter top with a little support, while small chested ladies who want to show off their perky little tatas should stick with flowy Ts or tanks, which is a look Miley seems to have mastered. If your nipples are the size of dinner plates or could cut diamonds on a brisk day, buy yourself a pair of nipple concealers so you don’t terrify children or break up marriages while out in public.
Is the Braless look sexy? Are nipples sexy? Guys/lady lovers, please sound off on this one. Check out the gallery of like-minded celebs who have opted to forego the underwire. Who’s doing it right and who’s doing it wrong?