I had the strangest crushes when I was younger. Unlike most girls who fell for members of N*Sync, or early ’90s filmstars, I had crushes on historical figures and literary characters.
I make no defense for this — I think it said a lot more about my groundings in reality than I would like to have realized. But there it was, and it started very early. My mother told me that after studying the Civil War some in kindergarten, I came into the kitchen and announced that if I could have married anyone, it would have been Abraham Lincoln. Men of stalwart virtue, with a classical/old world air caught my attention more than any other sorts — and also made my selection sparse, even nonexistent.
So, entering middle school and high school, with dreams of finding some William Wallace or Martin Luther of course left me entirely disillusioned. I could never be very satisfied with the average school-aged guy — I thought they were short-sighted, immature, and unpleasant. That’s not to say that I didn’t have male friends whom I liked a lot — it was just I couldn’t ever see them as potential romantic interests. Reading only made it worse — I fell in love with Professor Bhaer of Little Women, and likewise with Mr. Darcy. They were upstanding, proper, restrained yet passionate, chivalrous, honest, virtuous, purposeful, serious when it called for it, selfless, intelligent, cultured — refreshingly masculine. I wondered if I could ever find some sort of realistic equivalent nowadays — I was hopeful for a few years, and repeatedly disappointed. I became more and more convinced that I was destined to be a spinster. I had missed the boat — I was born a few centuries too late for my tastes. And I became very resigned to my fate.
Then, came college — and with it, a whole new circle of friends. Here, I met people who were very much like myself — people who loved philosophy, literature, history and art, and who loved to discuss it in a fruitful way. We met together often to discuss our own writing and to give/take advice. I met my very best female friend there — she is old-fashioned, yet fun-loving, intelligent, and she can hold her own in any discussion or debate. We are best friends to this day.
I also met a young man who I thought hated me, for some reason. His name was James.
He had been the one to start or amateur Literary Society, and displayed a fervent love for good literature, poetry and old philosophy. He was extremely quiet, and extremely serious, and would barely ever talk to me or even look at me. Rather than putting me off, this made me curious. He was so — untouchable. He was tall, with large blue eyes and dark hair, a handsome/Grecian face, and a cold-set mouth. He only ever talked to say something brilliant, but subdued — an observation about a text, or a breathless appreciation for the beauty of a certain line in poetry. Other than the warmth he had for beauty in art discussed, he never showed strong emotion, other than a seeming annoyance at anything else. He had grown up in the countryside, homeschooled. He liked classical music. He was an excellent student, with professors falling over themselves to have him as an aid, though he was just a freshman. He was brilliant.
People often asked him if he was from Europe, but he wasn’t — he just had a strangely proper way of talking. He wore 1940s era clothing and coats — genuinely old, not the hipster kind.
And of course, I wanted to tease him — I said he was an old man, and would tease him for being serious. Occasionally, he would indulge me and banter a bit, but only a bit, and would never break his serious visage.
And I thought he hated me.
I could tell you our love story. It would take a long time. But let’s say — after many months, I came to discover that far from hating me, he had been observing me from afar all that time. He thought I was beautiful. We spent some time amongst friends, talking here and there, but he still seemed so shy. I came to find out one night — he had finally asked my dad if he could court me. My happiness couldn’t have been greater when my dad said yes, he could –
And let me say, that Mr. Darcy vibe never went away, but only enriched. I love this man, and he is the ultimate gentleman — he always holds doors, always is gentle with me, always considerate, though he is commanding if need be, but never unfairly or cruelly — more to snap me back to reality. He is strong, but so incredibly loving. He is passionate for bigger things — he wants to start a classical-education focused school, where children can come and learn the old philosophers, Latin, Greek, history, math, science. He wants to take courses in Europe. He wants to write a well-done novel, in the old-literature style — and let me tell you, he is actually a wonderful writer, and I am not the only one who says so.
In more ways than one — he is a treasure. He is the Mr. Darcy I never thought I would have ever found. He is everything I could ever have dreamed of. For all his seriousness and old-manness, he has the heart of a warrior for things that matter.
What about you? Do you have a “dream man”? And if so, have you found him?
guest
I think the main draw Mr. Darcy possessed was his vast fortune, and high social standing.
Your guy is a sexist who wears clothes that are 70 years out of date. Not exactly the same thing.
tulip / 14 posts
What a fun post. I think I’d have to characterize my husband as Mr. Knightly from Emma
daisy / 506 posts
@HaleyWeasley - I see it!
guest
Back in high school when we were reading Jane Austen, some of my friends got into that “swoon for Darcy” phase. Although I have been smitten by a fictional character here or there (ahem, Dr. Watson), I would never set those standards to a real person. That’s basically setting myself up for disappointment there. The guy I’m dating now is goofy and loving and unlike any fictional character I ever had a thing for. But that’s why I love him. He’s the best version of himself. Not someone else. Fiction is fiction.
But I’m glad you’re happy and in love. Best of luck.
guest
This is adorable. <3
daisy / 617 posts
Aw, that’s cute
I’m glad things worked out for you.
rose / 786 posts
I love hearing stories like this (although this is far from just a story as it has actually happened, but I can’t really think of a better word). I just love this!
guest
Oh Mr. Darcy! *swoons*
guest
How adorable, I am ravished by your love story. I’m so happpyyy. And yes I too loved Mr. Darcy.
guest
I LOVE MR. DARCY, but excuse you, Colin Firth Darcy is way better. I do like MacFadyen, though.
guest
I’m madly in love with Mr. Darcy.<3
sunflower / 264 posts
@TheMushyPear@xanga - He’s not sexist? And he looks smashing in 40s clothes. Way better than he would in styles nowadays.
Also, the draw for the character of Mr.Darcy, at least for me, was his honorable and serious nature. Call me crazy, but that makes me swoon. You can keep your high-status, rich, immature types.
(That wasn’t an insult to you in particular, but it was meant as a universal “you”).
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - “he had finally asked my dad if he could court me. My happiness couldn’t have been greater when my dad said yes, he could”
That’s pretty sexist, friend. A woman isn’t her father’s property to hand off to some suitor.
sunflower / 264 posts
@TheMushyPear@xanga - I chose to do things that way. I could have very well have dated anyway I wanted to, but I wanted my dad to help me chose. I liked having that protection.
I know a lot of girls who don’t do it that way, and I don’t think that’s bad. I chose to do things that way. And James chose to ask my dad. And my dad has been a guiding presence in our relationship, giving us a lot of good advice and wisdom without being controlling at all.
..And that was all by my consent. So, no, neither my dad nor James is sexist. In fact, they are the most honorable and kind men (to women, as well as men) that I’ve ever known.
guest
Professor Bhaer! Love that you mentioned him! I love Jo from Little Women myself.
guest
So many women have “dream men”… I wonder if they can live up to the “dream woman” status in return.
@TheMushyPear@xanga - Pretty sure that was what ultimately drove Elizabeth Bennet into his arms, too. The entire scene where she was in Pemberley, checking out Darcy’s crib, was probably her strongest motivator. The other stuff, like his sob story about Georgiana and his help with the Wickham/Lydia fiasco, was icing on the cake.
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Therein lies the double-standard. When women want to feel “protected” and “pampered” like they somehow WORKED to get a vagina, they gladly subscribe to the sexist ideals of ye olde days (think chivalry, etc). When they want to feel “free” or “liberated” to do whatever they want, they denounce ye olde sexist ideals as “remnants of the oppressive patriarchy” and smash it down.
orchid / 118 posts
People who think the reason Mr. Darcy is appealing is his money need to reread Pride and Prejudice. (READ it, not watch it!) He starts out as a pompous ass–and even his money can’t make up for that, but then he turns out to be amazing. Actually, he’s still kind of a pompous ass for a while. lol Ah, Jane Austen’s men…so dreamy.
guest
*gag* i’ll pass. this isn’t the 19th century. and i’m not any man’s property.
lily / 5148 posts
Try North and South. It’s kind of a reversal of some sorts. The main guy ends up losing everything and the girl is given some dowry money by her godfather and they decide to reopen the main guy’s business together at the end.
I like swooning over that ;D and that kiss too. HMMMMMMMM
guest
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - amen! I mean it all seems a little too mushy to me. And like trying to recreate something that you read in a (very good) piece of literature…but fiction nonetheless.
sunflower / 264 posts
@HaleyWeasley - I loved Emma! And that is awesome!
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - I believe that submission to my dad is something that is right to do, even if it isn’t always convenient. Do I submit to all men that way? Hardly. In fact, I can be a spit fire when it comes to be ordered around. But my dad is a different story. He wanted to be involved in my life in such a way that would allow for a lot of liberty and decision making on my own–but also guidance and protection on his part. He wanted things that way. And I wanted to accept.
James, too, wanted to submit to my dad until I would one day submit to James in marriage. He wanted to ask his permission and advice concerning our relationship until that authority would one day be shifted over to him.
Actually, this concept was beautifully illustrated during our marriage ceremony this past Saturday. My dad walked me down the aisle toward James, but as we stopped I kept clinging to him. James’ dad stood at the end of the aisle, and asked us, “Who gives this woman to be lawfully wedded to this man?” And my dad answered, “My wife and I.”
And then, I kissed my dad on the cheek, and he placed my hand in James’ hand.
..It was meant to symbolize that, now, James was my authority, and that he was passing that authority to James from now on.
Do I have to listen to my dad in these things? I guess I don’t. I could have dated however I wanted to. But I think–if my dad is wise and loving…there is no reason to not submit to him.
Frankly, I am glad that these men in my life hold the two ideals that you seem to think are so opposed. They both believe that women are capable of changing the world, if they wanted to–they both believe in my intellect and natural gifting. They both believe that I could study alongside them (as I did with my dad in his study so many times, and as I did with James throughout our degree). They do believe woman are liberated in many ways.
But they also believe men (specific men–such as fathers and husbands) have the responsibility to protect and guide the women given to them–and that women, in turn, have the responsibility to submit to that authority. Did I always submit perfectly? No. Did they always lead perfectly? No. But, overall, this arrangement has caused blessing and happiness in my life.
..If that is sexist, than maybe we are sexist. But I only see good, not evil, from what my dad did for me.
sunflower / 264 posts
@ohveryoung@xanga - Thank you! That is encouraging.
sunflower / 264 posts
@andysigdelt@xanga - It was more the ideals–the type of man that could be found in fiction normally had a lot of passion for “great thing”. I was lucky to find someone that holds my ideals as strongly as I do…and you are lucky to find someone who holds the things that you think are important as much as you do!
We are all unique in what we secretly wish for in a mate.
sunflower / 264 posts
@xhalesx@revelife - Your comment made me smile really, really big! haha, thank you! I think we all have amazing love stories, if we would all write them down! I bet yours is lovely.
sunflower / 264 posts
@x__BeautiifulxDiisaster__x@xanga - I know, right? I love that guy.
sunflower / 264 posts
@crashthedr3am@xanga - That is really sweet and encouraging to me! Thank you! I am glad that you enjoyed it.
sunflower / 264 posts
@xobrandilynn_surveys@xanga - I really love his character!!
sunflower / 264 posts
@IdealBeauty@xanga - Colin Firth, ftw!!!
sunflower / 264 posts
@GreekPhysique@xanga - I love Professor Bhaer and I love Jo!! They are both awesome characters!
sunflower / 264 posts
@yourkbear@xanga - Exactly! The whole point is that Elizabeth thinks he is too proud because of his money and status, but when she actually sees how selfless and honorable she is, she falls in love with him!
sunflower / 264 posts
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - That is why I was asking what kind of men other people like, because we don’t all have the same tastes, of course! What are some qualities you like in a guy? I also see how it could just be the way certain qualities complement one guy in particular.
sunflower / 264 posts
@Hinase@xanga - I will have to look that up! Actually, that was recommended to me by one of my friends, now that I think of it! Wonder why?
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Also, I wanted to say that there are an array of family dynamics that work great! I don’t think everyone needs to have their dads so involved in courtship–it just depends on what the dad and mom desire, as well as what the children desire to an extent. I’ve seen it work well under even stricter standards than mine, and work beautifully under far more lax standards. Each family is unique.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - I assure you that if Wickham was the rich guy and if Darcy turned out to be the poser, the outcome would have been very different. The 19th century was not exactly a time period where love could be as easily pursued as it is today. I speak as one who has read P&P, too.
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Of course you see good from it – you have the choice to reject sexist ideals when you like, and “submit” to them when it benefits you in terms of protection, etc. That was kinda my point.
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Oh, I’m not saying that having your dad involved in courtship is a BAD thing. I’m just pointing out that there is a double-standard at play that is explicitly devoted to catering to your self-interests first, that’s all.
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - But, what about my dad and James..? Taking things slowly through permission/wisdom is good for both James and I. And, my dad really likes feeling as though he is protecting his daughter. It’s a win-win-win situation!
I do not deny, though, that I really like it. haha.
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Well, I think when you’re brought up or taught that there are certain ideals to be upheld in terms of self-sacrifice and placing others before yourself, you’ll likely adhere to them. And in our society, we generally bring up men to be more self-sacrificial in certain aspects because society considers men to be more expendable.
But I do bet it feels good, haha.
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Well, you’re “submitting” because it fulfills your own needs in a specific way. If you really wanted to, you could have said :”oh yeah? Screw you, dad!” and married whomever you liked. That’s why I keep putting “submit” in quotes
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - I don’t know, though, if it’s a matter of just when I like it. In submitting to my dad concerning relationships, he’s directed me away from multiple suitors that I thought would be good for me and he didn’t. We disagreed at that point, and I was gravely disappointed. I am not just saying this, though–with each guy, time eventually showed me what he was protecting me from. Not that these guys couldn’t be good guys–they just had some maturing to do. I had a lot of maturing to do, too. Oftentimes, I was attracted to guys who were way older than me, and even though they reciprocated my feelings, my dad said “no”.
..It’s not a matter of just what I feel is best for me, or what I want. That’s not the ONLY thing. By submitting to my dad’s authority, I am allowing him to guide me–even when I don’t agree. That is the right thing for me to do, in my family dynamic. It also comes down to what is right or wrong for me to do. Not just what I want to do.
Like I said before, though–I recognize that there are different family dynamics that different families use.
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - You’re right, actually. I mean, this whole comment is pretty accurate.
But, I did also serve my dad…I don’t want you to think I just sat on my butt all the time. :/ My dad was definitely..and still is, but in a different way…a great dad. And, I don’t mean that I naturally have a serving heart. I am pretty lazy. But, he didn’t let me get away with being lazy. I did a lot of things that helped him out…admittedly, BECAUSE of him most times, ha. But, I think it still helped things even out.
While guys do carry a great load by being the authorities..it doesn’t mean you can’t repay them back in some way that is important, even if it isn’t the same exact responsibility.
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Oh, I didn’t mean to imply that you were a lazy bum, haha. Even if you didn’t have a serving heart, that doesn’t mean you’re necessarily lazy or bad. Guys don’t naturally have serving hearts either; we’re just brought up, more often, to place the needs of others before ourselves. That’s why, for example, deadbeat dads have such a negative reputation in our society (and rightfully so, in my opinion).
True, there’s no reason people can’t pay the guys back. I think, though, that in this day and age, no one appreciates guys in that context anyways. In the past, being a man was something that was respected and celebrated because of the immense personal costs involved. Nowadays, we’re the butt of sitcom jokes simply because of our gender.
I think what I’m trying to say is that there is a double-standard when it comes to stuff like this. If you feel that “submitting” works for you, that’s fine. I’m not saying you’re a horrible person and that you eat kittens for breakfast while clubbing baby seals as a hobby. But the point is that the system is currently set up so you can, if you so chose, abandon the system with little or no loss to yourself.
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - No, it wasn’t a time when love was the top priority, but that’s what sets Jane Austen apart from her contemporaries. Have you read any of her other novels? The female protagonists always get the men they love. Always. Jane Austen wrote in a letter to her sister that she would give her heroines everything they wanted; that means more than just money and status. Austen was ahead of her time. She pushed for marriages based on mutual love and respect. She was not as outspoken as people like Mary Wollstonecraft, but she was pushing for changes in society. Her characters had to meet financial and social expectations of her time in order for her works to be read without offending her audience. This was my thesis topic, so I know what I’m talking about.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - Oh, I’m aware that the female protagonists in her stories got the men they loved.
“Jane Austen wrote in a letter to her sister that she would give her heroines everything they wanted; that means more than just money and status.”
Precisely; and money/status was the baseline, wasn’t it? I don’t recall too many instances where the protagonist was happily married to a pauper.
“Her characters had to meet financial and social expectations of her time in order for her works to be read without offending her audience.”
So much for “pushing” for social reform if she didn’t want to offend anyone…
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Even Shakespeare, with all his crazy crap going on in his plays, had to tie everything up nicely in the end to avoid offending his audience. Austen wanted her works to be read, or they never would have had a chance to make a difference.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - Right, like Romeo and Juliet, or Hamlet.
sunflower / 264 posts
@yourkbear@xanga - Good point!
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Killing everyone gets rid of the problems they have stirred up, so, yes, like Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet. And A Midsummer Night’s Dream and Measure for Measure and The Merchant of Venice. “Appropriate marriages” and death were acceptable ways to deal with the socially unacceptable issues he’d brought up.
orchid / 118 posts
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Well, he IS too proud, but he comes around. That’s the best part; he realizes the error of his ways. He thinks he’s too good for her, but he falls in love with her anyway.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - I think people appreciated his plays moreso for their controversy than how he wrapped up the plots (eg: his portrayal of women, etc). But there is something to be said for the plot resolution that can make a work of art, overall, more palatable.
Still, I think that Darcy’s riches played a more significant role than what you’re implying here. I don’t think it was so much an issue of “social acceptability” than it was you had pointed out, giving the protagonists the entire package. If love was that important to Jane Austen, I’m sure she could have pulled off a controversial concept like “lower member of landy gentry has a daughter who marries a pauper” and then as part of the plot resolution, the pauper makes a fortune selling pokemon cards or whatever and becomes famously rich.
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Captain Wentworth wasn’t loaded. In fact, Anne’s father initially rejected him for his lack of wealth even though Anne pined for him for years.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - He came back later with a fortune, and Anne regretted breaking off the engagement. Meh.
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Anne already regretted it. Yes, he had more money than before, but a man who made his fortune in the military was…not nearly as socially acceptable as the dirty scoundrel Mr. Elliot. It’s fun to argue with you, but you really don’t want me to break out my thesis sources and start quoting people with Ph.D.’s focusing on Regency lit.
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - Yes, but he was far from being considered a true gentleman in Austen’s time. But she (Austen) used his behavior to make him a real gentleman.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - Not AS socially acceptable, sure, but he still had money.
Like you said, Jane Austen wanted to give her protagonists everything in the end. I think that appeals to a lot of women even today, except many of them don’t fully understand the social dynamics of that period and don’t really recognize the gender roles of that time, ya know?
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - Even if he became a real gentleman under Austen’s crafting, it wouldn’t have made a world of difference if he remained poor – he would not have married Anne. Again, it’s getting those baseline requirements in some form or another, right?
lily / 5148 posts
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - It’s actually pretty good. It’s even more compelling since the romance is followed by the backdrop of the industrial revolution of some sorts.
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - It’s kinda like when guys pine after hot stars like Megan Fox and whatnot. Most of the guys who do that are average joes; why would they necessarily expect someone like Megan Fox to fall for them, right? Especially when she basically has her pick of just about any guy, including guys who have the combo of looks AND money/status… right?
orchid / 118 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - But the protagonists didn’t love the men for their money. The money was necessary to make them “acceptable” mates according to societal standards. Technically, Mr. Wickham would have been an acceptable mate, despite his lack of fortune, if not for his inability to control his spending and his tendency to try to cheat people.
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - I think what she might be saying is that for that time period, marrying a lower middle class man for love when you could have married a rich man was pretty revolutionary. She wanted to marry him when he was poor, too–it just would have been unheard of, unlike nowadays.
For the record–James isn’t loaded. There is a lot more to being a “Darcy” (I know, cheesy–but I mean it in reference to the ideal gentleman) than being rich. Which is a good thing!
orchid / 118 posts
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Exactly! And exactly!
guest
@yourkbear@xanga - I think you’re stretching it with Mister Wickham, because in that situation, the Bennet family would have had their estate entailed to Collins upon the death of the father, so it was in their best interest to find someone to marry their daughters. That’s why they initially grasped for him (and anyways, he still married Lydia so that – well, SORTA worked out, hahaha).
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - I understand that point and I think it’s also what made authors like Shakespeare, which she brought up earlier, so successful – their ability to play with very controversial ideas (for their time). I doubt, though, that Darcy would have such a following as he does now if it were not for the fact that, in addition to being that “gentleman” (which meant he was inclined to chivalry and other acts of disposing oneself at the service of women), he had the money. One way or another, he was taking care of the ladies, and that’s what made him so popular.
sunflower / 264 posts
@Awesomesaurusy@twitter - lol! Me, too. Seriously. I feel like a creeper for having so many fictional crushes now..haha.
guest
I think a guy should ask me if he can date me, not my dad. My dad doesn’t own my love life, I do!
sunflower / 264 posts
@Face_Of_Innocence@xanga - Well, obviously I would have to *agree* and *want* to date the guy, ha.
The reason he asked my dad was because my dad played a big part in the courtship. It was a way of recognizing his authority over me, as my sole protector until I am married. It’s not for everyone, but it wasn’t meant in any disrespectful way toward me. Just to give you some background.
guest
omg people, stop calling her a sexist, her view is just different. I think it’s more sexist to dress up like whores when going to a club just to catch the attention of guys that only want to sleep with you and that is most women idea of a friday night. She is romantic and idealistic and was lucky enough to find a guy who is just like her, so congratulations!
By the way i had a big crush on Mr Kightley when i read Emma as well
sunflower / 264 posts
@aradia_luna@xanga - Thank you! This was so encouraging…I am not just saying that. Thank you.
sunflower / 264 posts
@QuantumStorm@xanga - This is actually a reply to a statement you made awhile back, about being the “dream girl”. I think you have a point. I am not a dream girl… in many ways, James is a lucky catch for me. But I do think that it is important to be a good person, with an outward perspective, who wants to love other people and work for the greater good. A “dream girl” might also be the sort of person to serve and take care of her SO, in a way that isn’t slave/master relationship, but rather, because she wants to. A girl shouldn’t be given everything just because she is a girl.
..I do agree with you there. But, I also need to say that in many ways, I am not there yet (in case someone construes my agreeing with you as my saying that, somehow).
rose / 786 posts
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - I know. I love reading them! I actually posted a blog on mine. Someone did a how we met post, and asked to hear stories. Mine was unfortunately too long to post as a comment, and I so I wrote a post. I didn’t stop at how we met though. Haha. My boyfriend actually asked my dad if he could take me out on our first date, and then if I could be his girlfriend. And he will eventually be asking my dad if he can marry me. I love when guys do things like this, the old fashioned way. It shows respect for the people who are in the girls life before he ever was.
guest
Darcy is overrated. Austen is overrated. P&P was a terribly dull novel that I gouged my eyes to get through.
Now Sydney Carton from ATOTC is something else (:
guest
what a cute story
. Totally not the man for me, but what counts is that you are happy together.
guest
@Awesomesaurusy@twitter - I like him too. Because I can identify with him. I also like Severus Snape.
guest
Yay! You give the rest of us hope…it CAN happen.
guest
Never met a James I liked. All the Ians I meet are awesome though.
guest
Absolutely enjoyed ur article & Congrats u found the one . I can relate I always had a crus on Mr.Darcy ,I always have a major crush on Colin Firth’s characters like him in Bridged Jones’s Diary ,I think Hugh Grant has also got something real special about him
guest
@Jenny_Wren@xanga - Hi again… I took more time to digest your writing about your fiance.
You seem to write as if from a pushed distance, like you’re scared of him or he keeps you at a certain distance as to describe that you are very close with him in manners, or feelings. Am I correct? If not, you are a brillant love story writer and you should consider the impact of your creative writing skills.
guest
haha oh man, i am just like that type too girl. was soo in love with the darcy type.
and wish there is a darcy for me too one day.. haha but happy for you. =]
guest
Aww, congratulations!
I feel so much better for reading your post tonight… I was just thinking about Jane Austen and my impending eternal spinsterhood because I will never find a guy like that. A very recent ex of mine got engaged tonight (very damn quickly), and I am genuinely happy for him, because we were wrong for each other, but…. I like the idea that there’s a perfect someone out there for everyone, and that we don’t have to settle.
Does he have a brother? ^_^ jk
guest
its sad how people think that a man asking a fathers permission to marry their daughter is sexist .. it’s a respect thing, morons.
sunflower / 448 posts
@TheMushyPear@xanga - Sounds like that’s what she wanted. If that’s what they both wanted, is that so terrible? Are you trolling this post to undermine the happiness she’s found? Just leave the girl alone to be happy!