There’s recently been some of hubbub regarding to Dakota Fanning’s Cosmo cover. One glance at the 17-year-old hanging out next to headlines screaming “His Best Sex Ever” and “Um, Vagina, Are You Okay Down There?” explains why. However, I wonder if Cosmo isn’t so much pushing boundaries as they are appealing to their actual demographic.
My first magazine subscription was to American Girl, and it was the highlight of my month. I painstakingly tried to make its recipes, got advice from the “Heart to Heart” section and wished I could write journals as cool as Amelia’s. But around age 10, my friends and I started reading the harder stuff.
It started out innocently enough: a purchased Girl’s Life here, a daring peek into the now-defunct YM there. But by the time I turned 11, none of us were buying (supposedly) age-appropriate material. We were now all about publications like Seventeen (which made us feel like hotshots since it had “teen” in the title).
Our parents would have had fits, and that’s what made reading these magazines all the more appealing. Granted, they were really only slightly risqué, but the thought of “making out” and even the word “sexy” seemed dangerous and forbidden. I distinctly remember a number of times where we would secretly read Cosmo Girl in someone’s basement, taking all the precautions of kids smoking weed.
I started reading Cosmopolitan in early high school, along with every other girl I knew. What had we been thinking, reading Seventeen? That was kid stuff — this was clearly a magazine for sexy, mature women. And (as almost every outlet pandered to us) that’s what we were supposed to become! Wouldn’t we become so mature by reading it? So we eagerly devoured every issue, sexy spatula advice and all.
My interest in Cosmo faded during senior year as my identity and interests truly began to develop. A few friends read it for a bit longer, but soon none of us were interested. To this day, the only Cosmo readers I know are in high school. While I’m not here to provide a critique of the magazine, I think that says a lot about its message. Girls around Dakota’s age are frantically trying to establish themselves as “real women” for a variety of reasons, and Cosmo waves from magazine racks, promising to deliver just that.
Did you read “mature” magazines for your age? What do you think of Dakota’s cover?
guest
She’s seventeen for god sake. I picked up a Cosmo by then out of curiosity. I lost my virginity when I was 17. It’s no big deal. Again an overreaction.
rose / 937 posts
I don’t think I ever read any magazines other than the bubble-gum ones, and barely when I did. I’d rather novels, films, or television.
guest
I dont read magazines. Never did when I was a kid, and rarely do now. Only when Im sitting at the dentists or doctors office, then Id pick up a magazine to read. Im more of a.. newspaper freak. I dont really read the newspaper, just the news. Online. Before I go to school, after school, and before I sleep.
guest
I want that pink dress.
guest
I started reading Cosmo when I was 16. I still read it but I also read others that seem more geared towards the 20′s – 30′s age groups.
guest
i think reading magazines is just for fun.
i read it to laugh at the confessions. nothing else.
guest
I read whatever I wanted, whenever I wanted. My parents trusted me to be mature enough to understand certain things because, well, I was. My dad would kind of raise an eyebrow when he noticed I was reading “100 ways to make your man orgasm” at 13/14 yrs old but he never said anything. But I was also a really early bloomer physically and mentally so reading this stuff wasn’t taboo or strange for me. It was explaining things I already felt for quite awhile and I was already somewhat going through.
guest
I was exactly like you except for the Cosmo part. I picked up a total of two Cosmos and they were both when I was in college. I think it’s a slutty magazine and I find their advice hilarious.
magnolia / 1066 posts
I totally agree with you. And besides, it’s not like she’s some blind naive child that has no idea what *gasp* SEX! is. For the love of God, she was in The Runaways, which was about a minor getting into drugs, sex, and rock ‘n roll. Sheesh. People are so sensitive.
guest
Lol teeny bopper magazines are not suppose to be taken seriously, least of all Cosmo, haha. It’s a magazine directed for teens and singles looking to be in relationships. People in actual relationships already know 95% of Cosmo’s “advice”
guest
I think people are overreacting! I’ve read Seventeen since I was like 10, lol & my cousin still reads it & she just turned 28! The only magazines I read are Seventeen & Glamour & I don’t plan on changing that anytime soon.
rose / 791 posts
She’s seventeen, not twelve. I was reading Cosmo in my early teens, but it didn’t make me want to lose my virginity at a young or age or anything like that. People worry about the stupidest things.
guest
Those people make it sound as if girls her age and younger have never heard about sex before, while I know girls who are 12-13 and already lost their virginities to numerous guys. I’m 17 and I’ve been reading magazines every once and a while ever since I was like 6, I guess that’s why now they don’t leave an impact on me. I don’t think it’s reasonable to gasp over her being 17 surrounded with these headlines, while if she was 18, people wouldn’t have minded, though it is only a year older. Age is just a number, and you’re as mature as you behave, not as your birth certificate or dumb laws state.
guest
Not all females read magazines marketed for their age group…I didn’t. I actually feel like I’m totally over Cosmo and Glamour. Nowadays I am more interested in perfecting my craft in the kitchen and home decorating rather how many ways I can have an orgasm or how to get a man. I know, those mags aren’t only about those things, but for everything else like fashion and makeup, I can find that info online for free. When I did read those magazines (mid teens to early 20s), they did not make me want to have sex more or whatever people are getting their panties in a bunch over. I read the magazines for entertainment. Some people just overreact over everything. I know Dakota Fanning is only 17, and the headlines on the cover are racy, but if anyone’s ever read Cosmo, she would know that the cover celeb story typically isn’t a racy article. They are usually interviews–they talk about their work, family, favorite things, revelations, etc.
@x__RainOnHerParade@xanga - I agree, some people are just so sensitive. Simple solution, don’t like the article titles…don’t read the magazine!
guest
I love the transitions of magazines that everyone has. I remember reading American Girls when I was 8 to 10.
I read Cosmo now…but it’s out of interest and not because of the sex articles.
guest
I read cosmo …probably too young. Teen Vogue was my first sub. and my parents got me a year for one of my birthdays. I loved that magazine!
guest
Honestly, Girlslife is the only magazine I’ve ever actually liked (It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside whenever it comes in the mail)
Usually I only browse magazines for the fashion articles and fashion inspiration and everything else is just static, but with girlslife I actually love everything in their magazine; it’s just one of those “feel good” magazines that never let’s you down ^.^
guest
i still love to read cosmo magazine though.
guest
1. She’s nearly an adult age-wise.
2. I bet show business allowed her to mature and have much more of an adult-lifestyle than many “actual adults” do.
3. Who gives a fuck?
4. I’m thinking most seventeen-year-olds are sexually active and could use some advice instead of being “sexual health retarded” as many are.
guest
Hahaha my friend’s mom owns like every Cosmopolitan mag ever. We used to read them all the time, we were so sneaky >:P
guest
I mean it doesn’t even really look like her anyway…
guest
I don’t really believe in “age-appropriateness”. My mom always read Cosmopolitan (and a few others), so I read them from the day I could read, or well..skimmed through them. I didn’t even realize there was so much sex-stuff in it. I just skipped it beause I didn’t find it interesting (contrary to beauty related things). When I started to be interested in sex (as in curious about it), I bought myself teen magazines, and looked deeper into my mom’s one’s.
I think it is ok to look at what you want to become. It is often just curiosity about the world out there, it doesn’t mean you do things before you are ready.
Also, the influence of your diret surrounding is usually more important.
guest
Well, I read Reason. No sex advice but it can have a lot of “fucks” in it!
daisy / 505 posts
Haha we read American Girl and then YM! American Girl was the best. But I never read any magazine after YM except Newsweek, which is now about as stupid as Cosmo.
guest
I remember my mom getting me teen people before I was a teen and being confused. By from there I read J14 for awhile, some YM, then some CosmoGirl and Seventeen.
I remember being 16 and accepting a free subscription to Cosmopolitan. I had previously been exposed at 13 when my best friend gave me one to read (who I guess got it from her stepmom) when we were hanging out and having reading time.
I don’t know what to say about the age appropriateness. I feel like 16 really isn’t that inappropriate considering many teen girls end up losing their virginity around that time, though I waited until 19. I was just curious, really, and it made me feel more comfortable with the idea of sex. Which I think is healthy.
peony / 2 posts
I’m 17, and Cosmo has been my magazine of choice for a couple of years now. It’s just amusing, and I suppose it does make me feel more womanly. I think you’re pretty spot on.
guest
Cosmo is the worst magazine ever.
I had a subscription to Teen People for awhile, but other than that I didn’t really read magazines.
guest
Amen to this. Dakota Fanning might be the most appropriately inappropriate woman they’ve put on the cover yet, as much as nobody wants to hear it.
tulip / 22 posts
Huh. I’m 30 and I love Cosmo and have a subscription. :-/