A few weeks ago, Lindsay Lohan got the call to let it all hang loose for Hugh Hefner’s iconic Playboy. Well apparently, Hugh didn’t find LiLo’s pics good enough for her proposed full spread.
Hugh actually finalizes all of the spreads in the nude mag and he wasn’t impressed by Lindsay’s first photoshoot. The actress was asked to return for a re-shoot, and stripped down again for the spread. This time, it yielded better results.
Well. Second time’s the charm, I guess. In the meantime, Lindsay’s recovering from her mini-Beyond Scared Straight moment in jail. She was set to serve 30 days in prison, but got set free after literally 4.5 hours in jail — I heard thanks to “overcrowding.” Right…
What do you all think of Lindsay having to retake her pics? And how about that terrifying 4.5 hours in jail?
guest
I know it sounds like a copout, but I can actually see people in prison giving someone like her a really rough time. I’d be scared shitless in her position.
guest
Bet I wouldn’t get released after 4.5 hours…….
guest
If other people have to go to jail or prison, celebrities do to. Without exception. -_- Period. End of story. Over crowding my ass.
rose / 791 posts
This has nothing to do with the posts, but why does Lovelyish have random “avert pages” that pop up sometimes now?
daisy / 599 posts
Haha what did he expect, seriously?
daisy / 506 posts
@written_conversations@xanga - What do you mean? If you clarify, I can ask some tech folks about them.
orchid / 211 posts
Overcrowding is a real problem in prison (and it’s unfair that celebrities get priority when deciding who stays and who gets to go early). This wouldn’t be such an issue if we didn’t give prison sentences to people who commit nonviolent, self-destructive crimes. The US has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Lohan is a perfect example of someone who should have the shit fined out of them, rather than having tax dollars pay for her imprisonment, and then not getting justice because she is let out after a pathetic 4.5 hours.
guest
@AubreyBird@xanga - Exactly. Plus, studies show that when you put nonviolent people in a hostile environment with violent peers (i.e. a prison), they have a tendency to later display violent behaviors. So a white collar tax evasion case could be back in prison a year or two later for aggravated assault because his cell mate was put in there for battery.
Our system is definitely flawed, but I can’t imagine what would happen if suddenly we decided to just fine people into oblivion rather than incarcerate them.
orchid / 211 posts
@bittersweetromantic@xanga - This is so true. Prison is the best school of crime.
What I said about fining Lohan was a bit tongue in cheek; I’m not actually advocating having nonviolent criminals fined “into oblivion” per se. I just think we need a more diverse system of punishment rather than just throwing so many people into prison. I do think fining people is one of many possible alternative punishments. In a judicial system like ours, which is economically deficient, it always makes me wonder how things would be different if, instead of paying to punish people like Lohan or white collar tax evaders, they were to pay their own punishment away, whether through fines, extensive community service, etc.
guest
What?!?! 4.5 hours? I’ve waited longer at the emergency room, and I have insurance!!! Perhaps, she should made to work at a regular job like normal people rather than throwing her in jail.
As for the pictures, I would not want to see her pics in Playboy. And I am not really interested in what she has to say if she is the 20 Questions feature, or her Interview.
guest
While I understand and agree with the sentiments about housing nonviolent criminals, I kind of wish Lindsay had spent much more time in prison. At some point, in my opinion at least, you do have to say “hey, this woman has been given tons of slack and she still refuses to comply so this time let’s make her sentence stick till the end.” You can fine someone all you want but at the end of the day they don’t have to pay it. You take their possessions and they end up homeless. Then they turn to more serious crimes to get by which lands them in jail where they should’ve been in the first place. Those are just my thoughts for her.
guest
I don’t think throwing her in jail would even do anything in terms of changing her behavior.
guest
I know people who have gone to jail for days for basically nothing. Stupid celeb bullshit.
orchid / 211 posts
@ninetailedevee@xanga - “You can fine someone all you want but at the end of the day they don’t have to pay it.” Yes, actually, they do.
“You take their possessions and they end up homeless. Then they turn to more serious crimes to get by which lands them in jail where they should’ve been in the first place.”
No one said anything about making someone homeless. It’s about alternative justice. To play the devils advocate: You can have someone sit around in a cell for as long as you want, but at the end of the day they don’t necessarily learn anything. There are a lot of studies that indicate that prison does the exact opposite of rehabilitating a person; it breeds and reinforces delinquent behavior. Rather than sending her (or other nonviolent criminals) to serve out a sentence of incarceration (where she’ll just sit around watching tv, playing cards, and get harassed by other inmates) on the taxpayers money, it may prove more productive to have her pay a fine and then do extensive community service. That way she 1) learns to associate her crimes with money loss and spending her time picking up garbage (for example), 2) doesn’t waste as much of the taxpayers money, 3) repays the community as a sort of penance for breaking the law, and 4) doesn’t contribute to the extreme overcrowding of US prisons which should devote their funds to people who NEED to be removed from society.
But we can definitely agree on this: why on earth is she allowed to go unpunished? She still hasn’t learned and needs to serve out some form of sentence, which it seems she has yet to really do.
rose / 791 posts
@beca - recently, whenever I’ve gone onto some Lovelyish pages (not all, maybe 1/10 of them), I get directed to some page asking me to fill in a survey. I can quit out of it straight away, but it’s kind of annoying, lol.
daisy / 506 posts
@written_conversations@xanga - Yeahhh. Dang ads! I’m sorry about the annoyance but I’m unsure if there’s a way for me to end their existence. Thanks for dealing!
rose / 791 posts
@beca - I’m just wondering why you have them? I’ve been on here for like five years on various accounts and they only started a few days ago, lol.
guest
it’s fine, hugh hefner is probably the wisest man when it comes to nude girls, millionaire ballsack. i just can’t get over her teeth and wtf she must’ve done to make them that way.
guest
@beca - Probably the College Candy posts and such, I think.
guest
I ask again, do any guys even want to see her? Her hair is gross and she’s a skeleton. She was curvy and hot before, so if she’d done it before, I’d understand. But now??
guest
I miss the Lindsay from mean girls….
guest
@MissAshley - agreeeed. ahaha.
she looks disgusting now.
guest
I know Hugh’s bartender. The guy is awesome. I’m thinking in circles here.
guest
Someone put her in solitary confinement for life and be done with it.
guest
That would suck. You’re completely naked in photos & they’re not good enough for a man? Clearly, something’s wrong.
guest
send her to bootcamp instead and have the drill sargeant yell at her until she cries and begs to be released from hell
guest
Bahaha.. story of her life.