Oh how pumped I was for this movie! How much I declared I would see it opening weekend! How much did I ponder about Johnny Depp’s anti-aging genes! And oh, oh dear Lovelies, oh how much I loathed The Rum Diary.
Perhaps “loathed” is too strong a word? Because if I loathed something, it would imply there was something there towards which I would direct my rage fumes. It would mean that this film had much more substance to it than pretty people and beautiful Puerto Rican vistas — sadly, it did not. It’s much sadder to despise something that simply limps along without much plot, emotion, or anything to hold on to than it is to debate what something could have, might have been because some other things are almost there*. There’s nothing to work with here.
Supposedly The Rum Diary was a pet project for Depp, who found the novel amongst his late friend’s artifacts back in the ’90s, and got Hunter S. Thompson to publish the pre-Gonzo era novel. [via LA Weekly] This is pre-Fear and Loathing Thompson, but it’s still based a little on his life as a reporter in San Juan in the ’60s, told through the haze of perpetually drunk character Paul Kemp (Depp). Kemp manages his days through alcohol as he writes articles (and horoscopes) for the local newspaper, takes in the poverty of the native Puerto Ricans, and also finds himself falling in love with the beautiful blond fiancé (Amber Heard) of a rich developer (Aaron Eckhart).
And Depp looks great — even when he’s plastered — as does Heard, who is the epitome of “bombshell” on the screen. But despite all these characters (and there are a lot more) and the somewhat interesting premise here, nothing catches. At times I wasn’t sure if I was bored because the story was faltering or because the editing of the movie was awful — then I realized it was both.
While, yes, I have to credit the actors here because Depp embodies the spirit of his deceased friend so well, and everyone else in the movie seems to play their parts as much as they can — the real culprit here lies in the screenwriter and director, Bruce Robinson. The adaptation of the story skews from the book too much and too little. Obviously Thompson’s writing was always helped by a more streamlined narrative, but he also cut and melded much of the story. The impact of certain parts were cut down and pared and edited away to nothing. Nothing mattered, nothing was of consequence and there is no climax because the viewer doesn’t understand what happened in the rush to the end.
The Rum Diary is about the American dream and trying to find one’s voice, I suppose. However, there was no impact here. Instead there’s just inter-cut scenes from the life of a man on an island, and while there are big laughs occasionally, there is nothing that comes together to make sense by the end. Truly, Thompson rarely made lineal sense as a writer, but where Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas brought that non-sensical, comedic, and yet enthralling vision to the screen — The Rum Diary decidedly falters.
Grade: D
Director/Writer: Bruce Robinson
Original story: Hunter S. Thompson
Starring: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard, Aaron Eckhart, Michael Rispoli, Giovanni Ribisi
Film is out now in theaters. Rated R.
* Perfect example = all David Lynch films. There’s so much to ponder and debate! So many people can’t stand it, but they know it’s good or could be good, and some people think they are brilliant just as they are. The Rum Diary is the opposite of that.
Have you seen the movie? Do you agree with me or did you love the movie? Want to get into what you loved? Let’s discuss!
guest
I haven’t seen the movie yet. but I want to. I have mixed feelings about it though. we’ll see how I feel when I leave the theater.
orchid / 176 posts
@PrttyDdlyRvws@twitter - yes, and there were many changes to the characters (like his best pal on the island, and who Chenault was the fiance of). There were also many resolutions in the book that were decidedly cut from the film, and cut by the camera, abruptly. Referring to the adaptation is essential, but I tried to make the book less important in viewing the movie as a movie. Without having read the book, I would have so many more questions. Have you read the novel? Would love your take!
ranunculus / 3457 posts
“poverty of native Puerto Ricans”… oh, yet another American who thinks of Puerto Rico as an underdeveloped shithole. The 1960′s-1970′s were the economically strongest years for PR.
peony / 4 posts
@jessicaxmaria – Oh no, I know how much you were looking forward to this movie! SAD.
guest
I read in a Vanity Fair article that the reason some things differed so greatly from the book is because they didn’t see those things working on-screen. I get that. Sometimes, as much as you love the book, you have to accept that they can’t make it exactly like the novel. If you’re interested in it, it was a pretty good article. Plus it has nice pictures of Johnny Depp to drool over while you read.
Yeah, I’m seeing this soon. Alone if I have to. (My boyfriend doesn’t care for Johnny Depp haha)
One movie that was a huge disappointment was The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. They butchered the story, even though the original plot seemed interesting enough to hold its own on-screen. I stopped watching less than halfway through. It was just hard to watch. :/
orchid / 176 posts
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - that’s not my opinion; that is what Depp’s character Kemp sees. He takes photos of natives living in cars while his developer friend played by Eckhart reaps the benefits of the land while putting peope out of work. It’s actually a strong point in the movie that I wish they had developed. I just described what Kemp was seeing, so perhaps you have a problem with Thompson/Robinson’s take on PR in the 60s.
@blackspiders@xanga - And I completely understand that they have to adapt something to make it work on screen; the sad part is that they adapted it to the point of nothing happening. Also, there’s someone that doesn’t care for Johnny Depp in this world?! His charm can’t get to everyone?! I think the best adaptation to IMPROVEMENT on the screen was Fight Club. The book was okay, but the movie blew me away.
orchid / 176 posts
@PrttyDdlyRvws@twitter - I’m a huge Hunter S. Thompson fan. I mean, he changed journalism with his style and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is both a great movie and book. I’m just not sold on this adaptation; there was no substance. Which is sad because I was so looking forward to it! You can definitely save some money until it comes out on video…
magnolia / 1066 posts
fiancée*
This is disappointing. I was looking forward to it. It’s kind of my personal mission in life to see all of Johnny Depp’s movies, though, so I’ll redbox it one day
orchid / 176 posts
@x__RainOnHerParade@xanga - you may enjoy it if all you want is lots of Johnny Depp screentime
Johnny Depp looked pretty good through-out…I’d say even when he was hung over, ha.