I guess we only care about your execution if you’re like TOTES pretty. [via The Awl]
rose / 795 posts
What the hell? I can’t even.
lily / 5148 posts
daffodil / 1601 posts
I mean, maybe if they were beautiful on the inside too? But…quick glance at the article and it looks like a bunch of drug trafficking, prostitution, and a murder too. So, uhm, yeah. What?
Some of these girls were executed for murdering people and such. O.o
Maybe it’s a really weird fetish blog?
If you thought it was stupid, why’d you repost it on Lovelyish?
daffodil / 1569 posts
@ohforrealson@xanga - because if we only posted things that were non-stupid, there would be nothing for anyone to click on
sunflower / 339 posts
@Jessica - So true.
@they_call_me_steffyjean@xanga - lol. But the things we post that are “stupid” are the things you guys read the most, so IDK.
daffodil / 1975 posts
Slow day at Lovelyish, huh?
dahlia / 2747 posts
hahaha. chinese men are just pissed cuz they’re scrambling to find any girl, and here are beautiful girls that are killed.
@betterdesigned@xanga - oh hey, haven’t seen you in awhile!
@Jessica - Yep! I was out, living life and starting up a business. It’s pretty good to be back. Maybe, someday soon, I’ll submit something to you guys again. =D
@Jessica - Hey now, I wouldn’t so much say that I’m one of those reads the stupid stuff. I just liked the title. Hahaha.
What are the ladies of Lovelyish doing on a site like that to begin with? haha
@betterdesigned@xanga - yay, welcome back!
the majority of those women were drug trafficking, murderers, and money embezzlers… thus, oh well. a few were driven to kill due to abuse and rape but no less, they were punished lawfully in their country i assume. though i wouldnt call these criminal women beautiful. -_- they were dangerous!
@Jessica - We only read stupid things? How would you know the difference between what’s been read that’s stupid and what’s being read that’s intelligent if you never post intelligent things???
Besides, I think at this point people don’t expect anything more of Lovelyish than to post stupid things.
@Jessica - ok well, I’m going to go ahead and apologize for my fellow xangaers who feel like picking fights today *cough above cough* and turn the attention back to this post. Thats for real disgusting/super sad. I like to at least pretend I live in a world where people don’t fantasize about pretty serial killers :/
also, thank you for the daily Seth and Amy installment
daisy / 658 posts
i saw this on chinasmack. only 1 or 2 i would actually consider to be above average looking
ohhh u found it on chinasmack too. i freaking love that site,except when they cover stories about animal abuse. T__T
@Jessica - That’s… kind of sad. Does the traffic record come up as how many people click on a post, or how many people actually comment on a post? In determining which is most popular, I mean.
I think Lovelyish does a good job on the whole, but there’s room for improvement… like those freakin’ College Candy posts! Can we stop those? lol
i think it’s more a “really blog” this one…
wow I am shock lol…
man, i totally thought this was going to be about 10 very brave and heroic women who were executed in china while fighting for human rights or something. bummerski.
orchid / 146 posts
Any loss of a beautiful woman is a loss for humanity. Take the ugly ones instead!
Maybe because “beautiful chinese women” is searched more often than “chinese execution”?
@ohforrealson@xanga - we can see both pageview count and comment count, the same way that you guys can see it on every post.
@PinkLeopards@xanga - We do post things that people would probably consider more on the “intelligent” side, but they will invariably get about 1/5 the pageviews that a Miley Cyrus post would get.
@Jessica - So in short you’re willing to post stupid shit just to get page views. Wow, blogging has gone way down hill.
@PinkLeopards@xanga - Haha, no, but any editorial outlet worth its salt has to consider its readers’ interests and serve those accordingly. Pageviews is not the only way to gauge this, but it’s certainly an important one.
@Jessica - If that’s the type of reader you were trying to attract, the simple minded person with no interest whatsoever in reading anything intelligently written, then you’ve done a fabulous job in getting your audience.
@PinkLeopards@xanga - No, that’s wasn’t really my point. If we are consistently running posts that get little interest and low traffic, we’re not doing a good job of serving our audience. For example, if Sports Illustrated was spending copious time and resources covering golf, but noticed that more readers were reading/clicking on basketball articles, they’d be smart to up their b-ball coverage. All websites monitor site traffic to gauge what their readers are interested in. Since our readership is generally young and female, we’ve learned to choose topics based on what we’ve learned over time those readers are interested in. But if anyone doesn’t find themselves to be interested in those topics, then I would understand why they wouldn’t gravitate towards our website.
@PinkLeopards@xanga - Well, I don’t post things I think are irrelevant. If someone thinks most of our content is such, then they should probably not read this website, because it doesn’t sound like they’d be having too much fun.
And I think you mean Datingish? On Lovelyish we’ve only cross-posted maybe 3 of Jenn’s posts.
@Jessica - I think there’s a big difference between a preference of baseball over golf and a preference of things that are relevant to the idea behind Lovelyish and a post that’s completely irrelevant, mindless dribble.
I think what’s frustrating a lot of Lovelyish’s readers is that they liked Lovelyish before Jenn and CarlyPaige showed up and started posting very regularly. I don’t know how clearer it could be from all the comments. People visit the site NOW not because they enjoy the content, but because they’re desperately hoping that you actually paid attention to what they want and changed the content. They’re trying to give Lovelyish a chance but it’s a perpetual cycle of disappointment.
People don’t come here for the articles, seriously. They come here for the comments, and the bitch wars that ensue.
@Jessica - If your attitude is simply “then don’t read it” then you clearly don’t give two shits about the readers. Don’t worry, keep posting stupid shit and Lovelyish won’t exist anymore. lol
@PinkLeopards@xanga - Haha. Well, if you read all of my comments, you should realize that that’s an oversimplification of what I’m saying. Anyway, cheers, and I hope you decide to keep reading
@Jessica - I read all of it honey, and that’s the impression you give. lol
I’m only here because the dumb bimbos love to hate me, it brings traffic to my site.
I read the article, most seemed to lived in a crappy state of society. I think if their lives were more richer and safer, I’m sure they would less likely turn into criminals. Horrible lifestyle= breeds crimes.
@PinkLeopards@xanga - whatever gets you here!
I do sympathize with the woman who killed the man who KILLED her little boy and then tortured her. Murder is never right, but you know, under circumstances like that….it’s easy to see why she did that
@PinkLeopards@xanga - And yet, here you are!
orchid / 165 posts
who cares if they were beautiful. though, i don’t think jiu feng deserved death penalty.
If you read “why/what” their crimes were you’d pity some of them. :/
They went through some horrible times and people have a limit. Though I think the “beautiful chinese women getting executed” title is a bit stupid.
@ChuuCheee@xanga - Agreed.
The important thing is that the state has killed. If they are beautiful or not is a very superficial analysis …
WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
buy a blogad