Lea Michele shows some boobage on the cover of March’s issue of Cosmo. Oh, hey, Cosmo found my future boyfriend?! Are they keeping him captive somewhere?
yea… she doesn’t have a lot of boobies. but that’s ok, neither do i.
i’m a bit sad they felt the need to try to photoshop some in.. most women don’t come with giant porn star boobs, why can’t natural be considered beautiful too?
crumpledmoments
guest
January 28, 2011 @ 6:05 pm
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - it looks very fake. it’s too bad because she looks perfect the way she is on the show.
Her face is so beautiful, I didn’t even notice her chest. Boobies, no boobies. The girl is absolutely stunning.
JusticeCho
guest
January 29, 2011 @ 3:58 am
Doesn’t look like they tried to make her chest bigger, or at least not by much. What they did do was smooth her skin way too much, but that’s kind of common on Cosmo covers, or even just most covers in general unfortunately. Looks decent on her face, but from the neck down it’s definitely over done.
Other than that…gotta love Cosmo taglines on their covers. I wanna know how they found future boyfriends as well heh.
Aaaand, cue the derogatory comments about small boobs. Grow the fuck up people, jeezus. Seriously.
stilllookingforsomething
guest
September 20, 2011 @ 1:02 pm
Everyone keeps talking about how she looks like she has a boy’s chest but I think she just looks toned and perky (yes, and kind of small). I don’t think it looks bad, she looks great.
ranunculus / 3457 posts
Something about that looks Photoshop-tastic and I can’t pinpoint what exactly.
guest
looks like she has a man-chest.
guest
Melting boxer briefs sound very painful. Please don’t! D:
dahlia / 2747 posts
@B2yan_C@xanga - LOL
guest
yea… she doesn’t have a lot of boobies. but that’s ok, neither do i.
i’m a bit sad they felt the need to try to photoshop some in..
most women don’t come with giant porn star boobs, why can’t natural be considered beautiful too?
guest
@MoonFaeEyryan@xanga - it looks very fake. it’s too bad because she looks perfect the way she is on the show.
lily / 5148 posts
Not much boobs, huh? It’s fine but it looks like they are trying to hard here. She looks fine on the show.
sunflower / 321 posts
whew! thats like a little boys chest
guest
Uhhh, not sexy. It looks like someone’s abs.
guest
@vain_apathy@xanga - Because many people, like the commenters on this site, think less of small boobs.
ranunculus / 3285 posts
Love her voice.
guest
im kinda getting sick of this girl
guest
It looks really photoshopped!
guest
Super photoshop? .__.
tulip / 20 posts
Her face is so beautiful, I didn’t even notice her chest. Boobies, no boobies. The girl is absolutely stunning.
guest
Doesn’t look like they tried to make her chest bigger, or at least not by much. What they did do was smooth her skin way too much, but that’s kind of common on Cosmo covers, or even just most covers in general unfortunately. Looks decent on her face, but from the neck down it’s definitely over done.
Other than that…gotta love Cosmo taglines on their covers. I wanna know how they found future boyfriends as well heh.
sunflower / 342 posts
…I really like her ring though!
xo’
guest
……………
dahlia / 2103 posts
Aaaand, cue the derogatory comments about small boobs. Grow the fuck up people, jeezus. Seriously.
guest
Everyone keeps talking about how she looks like she has a boy’s chest but I think she just looks toned and perky (yes, and kind of small). I don’t think it looks bad, she looks great.