Here is Kirsten Dunst on the cover of V Magazine portraying old Hollywood wearing Dolce and Gabanna. This is what she shares:
What she says about her role in the forthcoming movie All Good Things: “I know I’ll be seen in a very different light. This role is the most I can show of myself and I think it’s the best work I’ve ever done, for sure.”
What she says is next for her: “I’m ambitious. I want to do great work and work with great directors and do great movies and produce great films. I have criteria for myself that are probably too hard to ever meet, but I’m going to try. I think people who say they’re not ambitious and have gotten to a place of success are lying.”
What do you think about this look for her?
sunflower / 362 posts
i think she kinda looks scary..but idk, i kinda like that xD.
guest
i don’t know.
i’m leaning more towards fail.
orchid / 234 posts
She needed a better hairdo,I mean….a hairdo. I like the clothes etc.
daffodil / 1607 posts
Her eyes are so pretty but she looks so sleepy =\
guest
She looks lifeless. Her face is annoying me – it’s so dull. The lighting and make-up just enhances this. She looks bored and lifeless – this makes me feel bored and lifeless. Meh. She suits most looks, but not this.
guest
Ech. Fail.
guest
I think she’s a fantastic actress and a GORGEOUS girl!
guest
Beautiful
guest
I think the smiling picture is kind of scary, haha. However, I love her as an actress, so I’m excited for her upcoming film!
guest
win
guest
In some she looked really good, and in others she doesn’t. It was okay.
guest
she looks kinda scary
guest
Her face = FAIL.
magnolia / 1296 posts
i actually say win
sunflower / 380 posts
WIN. i love the cover pic except for whatever’s going on w/ her hair (lighting? accessory?). she looks high in the second pic, but happy
the close-up of her face where she has her hands on her head is lovely. it’s not perfect overall, but i really like it. what happened to her though? she’s kind of fallen off the map.
guest
Fail…. I love her, seriously! but that was just um awful!!!
guest
JUMANJI
Whatever, I love Kirsten Dunst. She’s awesome.
guest
i think she’s beautiful and can pull it off,
i just like to see her more in a cutesy kind of way, like in elizabethtown.
that movie just made me fall in love with her!
guest
She looks so bored! I love her and I think she’s pretty but these photos aren’t that great.
orchid / 236 posts
She looks great in some of them but not so great in the others :/
guest
i like the cover photo, but not the others. fail.
guest
fail
dahlia / 2942 posts
her eyebrows…ew…
guest
i don’t like it…it’s a fail.
guest
@Meowmeowkimmaee@xanga - I know right! All I noticed is how horrifying her eyebrows look.
rose / 917 posts
I gotta say I like that it’s very vintage
guest
@wideopenskies@xanga - I second that.
guest
fail. what’s with her eyes? she looks freaky.
guest
Fail.
guest
Adorable! I think she should keep up the Old Hollywood look.
guest
FAIL?
guest
Definitely a fail. Wtf is with that second picture haha
guest
wish there was more variation in her expressions…
guest
I like the second last one, but mostly fail.
guest
I don’t really like it that much..
guest
I am going to choose to give Kristen an incomplete on this project. The hairstylists gets a fail. The photographer, and stylist both get a win.
guest
i like the old school 1920′s thang goin on so i like it.it’s somethin different for a change =]
guest
Not bad, love her lashes
guest
The clothes are gorgeous and usually she’s pretty gorgeous herself but it doesn’t look like it from the pictures… I’m not sure what it is, but it kinda looks like her face is stretched out in some of them.
guest
her eyebrows are seriously amazing
hydrangea / 82 posts
I LOVE IT total win i dont think anyone could merely pull this off!
daisy / 661 posts
i don’t like it
guest
They were going for the “Old Hollywood Look” for this shoot. There’s a reason for the way they did her make-up and the sleepy look and all the other criticisms. This isn’t cutting edge fashion, this is stuff from the mid1900s. Come on. Look at actresses from the late 30s through the early 50s and you will see this was the standard. Retro to the Nth degree. It is more art than fashion now.
guest
@Wendy - exactly.
guest
Win.
guest
It’s disappointing that a magazine can make someone as beautiful as Dunst look that unattractive.
I like the face close-ups, but that’s about it….. So overall fail.
guest
i hate her face :S
guest
I say win! She’s looking good and is a very great actress! I support her!
sunflower / 490 posts
shes prettyy but she looks weird in some of the pictures.
guest
I’ve always hated her, but I guess they’re not that bad?
orchid / 153 posts
omg i love it. i dont even likle her that much, but this shoot is total win.
guest
Lovely!
guest
I like the last picture a lot. She can’t act for shit, though!
guest
Win
guest
win
guest
looks good! win.
guest
she’s pretty, but it doesn’t remind me of old hollywood
guest
Win
guest
I’ve seen better and it’s not her style. Fail.
guest
its different, you wont find a photoshoot like it. and i like it. ive always been a kirsten dunst fan. the only one thats a bit of a fail is the second picture
guest
the black and white ones are very 40′s- those are win.
guest
fail
guest
why do her eyes look so weird?
i don’t know about this look…
guest
Fail. She’s too boho to pull this off….
guest
These are made of win. They have a spot-on old hollywood feel!
guest
2nd photo her face looks fat, 4th doesnt even look like her,&&7th looks very amature. who cares what she looks like. she got paid for it so the fail belongs to the magazine
magnolia / 1030 posts
i like the shoot idea and some are great, but whats with the seizure eyes??
guest
win
guest
win
guest
It’s a moderate win.
daffodil / 1622 posts
fail
guest
omg wtheck is wrong with her eyes rolling back
maybe once is okaybut it’s in EVERY picture…fail.
guest
fail
guest
Kinda creepy..
hydrangea / 94 posts
I love Kirsten Dunst! I think she sort of has an old Hollywood face.
guest
I dont normally like her all that much , but I think it’s actually really cute for some odd reason