Lovelyish

They look cute!

They’re probably look cute on baby’s feet but they’re ugly in that picture.

HOT HOT HOT!

i think it’s a little ridiculous

SUPER CUTE but super expensive!

uggs are never hot, but babies are adorable. lol.

they’re adorable on babies i think hahaha

Considering the fact that I wouldn’t put my baby in a mini skirt I would probably buy these. As overplayed as they are in fashion they are still warm and useful.

I think they’re cute.

I put the knock-offs on my kids.  But I don’t think I would ever spend that much money on shoes made for babies – their feet grow SO fast, they might not have time to wear them!

Adorable. Hot? Not so much….

Babies, toddlers and kids look cute in everything. haha

as long as we don’t see any babies dressed as sluts in uggs, short shorts, and northface.

omg D:

They get ruined in no time just by adults, I couldn’t imagine those lasting long on children… and adults who wear them can’t seem to lift their feet, I know that I wouldn’t want my kids doing that too!

Not

haha i think it would look cute on babies

i think it would actually look cute!

@cornyonacob@xanga - I used to wear uggs, short skirts, and a north face back an high school because everyone else was doing it. One day I looked around at all the shivering girls desperately trying to get warm by cuddling with ANYONE in the surrounded area and I was like “I think I’ll start wearing leggings. Warmth over fashion any day although leggings came back into fashion about a year after my “discovery”

That being said i still love my Uggs and would put my baby in knock off Uggs

i think they are SUPER CUTE! whenever i see them i always have to mention how cute they are..
though they ARE indeed expensive.. so i would get a cheaper alternative… EMUS!

I really think Uggs in general are terrible looking. Too expensive & not cute. Just bulky & they make it look like you have cankles.

I think they’re cute but way too expensive. its not like an adult where you can get a few years out them, babies grow like weeds. its a waste of money.

Not bad at all but yes most pricey

Ugly.

the baby version are much lighter than the adult version. They have no sole, its just the soft shearling material throughout the shoe. I think its cute. U get what u pay for with Uggs, i’ve tried the bearpaw version and they do not in any way compare to uggs. I’d rather pay a bit more and get a quality item than pay less and get less.

UGLY!

uggs are only cute on babies.

except i feel bad because apparently they kill the sheep to make uggs, so it’s like putting dead sheep on your kids’ feet…

babies look cute no matter what!

uggs are so cute, but they’re so expensive and they’re not waterproof so i probably wouldn’t get it for my children if i had any.

They’re a lot cuter than regular Uggs but baby Vans look so much more awesome!

They’re cute but, when I have kids, they’ll be in Converse instead of Uggs. Sorry.

Cute, and I’m sure they’d be comfortable. But too pricey and too heavy.

given the area i live in, uggs are tops for footwear.

if i had a baby, i’d buy him/her a pair.

dumb

baby versions of uggs or any other boots or other shoes are adorable they are not hot, they are unbelivably adorable. uggs on adults, not hot at all.

I will never put UGGS on my feet because they’re FUGLY so why would I put them on my children?!!

yes i would they look cute and very soft

Adorable!:}

Normally I’d think Uggs are ugly but these are soooo cute!
Except I probably wouldn’t want to spend TOO much money on my one-year-old’s boots, since they’d grow out of them very soon anyway.

Cuuutteee

They’re bad enough on adults, there’s no reason to inflict them on your child.

SO CUTE. HOTHOTHOT.
my niece has them and they dont look ugly like they do on adults. sosososo cute!

i find them extremely cute : )

Simply adorable and precioussssssssss!

NOT!

shoes for babies who aren’t going outside much and can’t walk are silly.

precious!

That’s a waste of money.

I loath Uggs in all shapes and forms. I can’t wait for this fad to die in a fire.

uggs are uggly. period.

on anyone of any age.

Anything is cute on a baby. Slobber is cute on a baby. It’s got nothing to do with Uggs. But this is the only way Uggs will ever be cute. 

CUTE!!! all babies shoes r cute tho, i bought so many pairs of shoes for m y niece and they all were cute. && i dont think uggs r really taking over the world, i rarely see anyone wearing them in L.A. now what i do see are ankle booties, motorcycle boots, and thigh high boots EVERYWHERE

@MessyJessieMarie@xanga - I couldn’t agree more!

I think they’re both ugly and ridiculous. The same as how I feel about Uggs for adults. :p 

very cute.

if i have a baby, i d wear uggs with them..

CUTE TO DEATH

But then i’d never buy Uggs coz it kills sheep to make a pair

Um, no. Is that even good for the baby’s feet?

I think they look cute on babies…lol, my niece has a pair but her legs are too fat for her to wear them

I loe them, would buy my 3year old a pair if I had the money

so cute!

is it weird i think these are totally adorable for babies but i hate them on girls my age haha

they prob. are over priced though

I had uggs for my daughter when she was about 1….she did not hate them and they were not hard to get on. They kept her looking adorable and her feet warm in our freezing house.

Ridiculous

they ONLY look like they are made for babies – they were meant to be baby booties, so yes!

those are ADORABLE hahah aww 

i don’t like the normal uggs but i think baby ones would be cute. reminds me of them little things moms knit for their kids or something.

Ridiculous- Waste of money unless you’re a millionaire that can spend as if it’s nothing. People are getting too carried away with fashion and they can’t see the the difference between ‘looking good’ and ‘being wise’, especially at this time.

Why spend a lot of money, one shoes for babies when they can not even walk? Babies grow super fast.